Comments on: Why MuGard Will Be Successful http://www.themarketfinancial.com/why-mugard-will-be-successful/258?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=why-mugard-will-be-successful Taking the Risk out of Risk Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:39:37 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Edmundo Marcusen http://www.themarketfinancial.com/why-mugard-will-be-successful/258/comment-page-1#comment-34617 Edmundo Marcusen Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:23:28 +0000 http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=258#comment-34617 hey!,I like yourreview so much! share we chat more about your weblog on MSN? Looking forward to see you. hey!,I like yourreview so much! share we chat more about your weblog on MSN? Looking forward to see you.

]]> By: Listas de Correo http://www.themarketfinancial.com/why-mugard-will-be-successful/258/comment-page-1#comment-31695 Listas de Correo Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:59:05 +0000 http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=258#comment-31695 vengo de otra pagina y la verdad que no se entendia nada alli, muy bueno! gracias,, bien explicado! vengo de otra pagina y la verdad que no se entendia nada alli, muy bueno! gracias,, bien explicado!

]]> By: WylieG http://www.themarketfinancial.com/why-mugard-will-be-successful/258/comment-page-1#comment-841 WylieG Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:17:59 +0000 http://www.stockshaven.com/?p=258#comment-841 MuGard was touted as a $1B product already with FDA approval and Access WAS a nice investment opportunity or so it seemed until SCO (Vulture Capitalists) got involved via a very dilutive convertible note. For $4.5M Access execs turned over 80% and control of the company to SCO. Part of the deal involved SCO placing two of its people on the Access Board. In effect Access execs sold out shareholders for a pittance. I am sure there were other financial distributions that made this a good deal for Access upper management otherwise it makes no sense at all. Fortunately I bought in at under $2 and sold at over$10 prior to the web broadcast back in Feb '07 when an investor asked about the SCO note and Davis pausesd stuttered and paused again and again trying to make it sound relatively harmless. A year later it was back under 2.00 and Advaxis hadt yet to sell a jug, bottle or jar of MuGard as SCO's deep pockets allowed them to sit on the product until the stock tumbled to where they could start buying up more shares. At the top of your blog you state, "half the time companies which are not listed on a major exchange tend to lie, cheat and do just about anything possible in order to stimulate investor demand". It seems Access connections have done just that in order to dry up investor demand. They have a billion dollar product and they want it all to themselves. MuGard was touted as a $1B product already with FDA approval and Access WAS a nice investment opportunity or so it seemed until SCO (Vulture Capitalists) got involved via a very dilutive convertible note. For $4.5M Access execs turned over 80% and control of the company to SCO. Part of the deal involved SCO placing two of its people on the Access Board.

In effect Access execs sold out shareholders for a pittance. I am sure there were other financial distributions that made this a good deal for Access upper management otherwise it makes no sense at all.

Fortunately I bought in at under $2 and sold at over$10 prior to the web broadcast back in Feb ’07 when an investor asked about the SCO note and Davis pausesd stuttered and paused again and again trying to make it sound relatively harmless.

A year later it was back under 2.00 and Advaxis hadt yet to sell a jug, bottle or jar of MuGard as SCO’s deep pockets allowed them to sit on the product until the stock tumbled to where they could start buying up more shares.

At the top of your blog you state, “half the time companies which are not listed on a major exchange tend to lie, cheat and do just about anything possible in order to stimulate investor demand”. It seems Access connections have done just that in order to dry up investor demand. They have a billion dollar product and they want it all to themselves.

]]>